The purity of essence of our precious category tags |                     |
Patton has accused me of being overly concerned about wasting a scarce natural resource. The category tag. In this, of course, he is completely wrong. Naturally, I could have argued that over-categorizing a post dilutes the utility of tags. And I would have been right. But that wasn’t the point. I was attacking him on aesthetic grounds, and just to stick a stick in his eye.
Just to prove that I am not some sort of homo-tree-hugging-enviro-commie, this post, which really is about everything, is tagged with every category we have. And, when I have a free moment, I’ll add some new categories, and add them to this post.
So there.
Buckethead Simpson, you are drunk!
Posted by on 06/03 at 09:00 PMYou know, I never actually noticed those icons until just now…
Posted by NicholasV on 06/03 at 10:31 PMNicholas, you have no idea how that hurts. I spent hours - no, days - creating those icons and then getting them to work on the blog.
Of course, not many other people ever noticed, either.
Posted by on 06/03 at 11:57 PMThey’re fantastic actually, and now that I think about it, they definitely had a positive impact, I just never consciously noticed they were there.
It was one of those situations where now that I think about it, I noticed them all along, but at the time it never actually seemed apparent.
Posted by NicholasV on 06/04 at 09:57 PMNow, I’ve totally noticed those things before.
I just didn’t know they meant anything…
Posted by Murdoc on 06/05 at 09:09 PM
Navigation
Next entry: Washingtonienne Files for Bankruptcy
Previous entry: Goddamn aesthetes with their standards and their glassware