Darwin Award Contender
Sunday, September 09, 2007
A new low, or high, depending on how you look at it | ![]() ![]() |
In my time, I’ve seen examples of just about every scam possible via the Internet. It takes a lot any more to even get my attention as I’m one-button flushing my spam folders.
However, when someone goes above and beyond the call of scum-baggish presumption in reader/recipient stupidity, I think it deserves to be highlighted. I’m a “giver” that way.
Below, in its exact form, including the badly mangled HTML formatting, but minus the actual link to the scamster’s site, the silliest and least plausible piece of spam I think I’ve received in at least a couple days:

|
|
After the last annual calculations of your fiscal activity we have determined that you are eligible to receive a tax refund of $93.60. Please submit the tax refund request and allow us 6-9 days in order to process it. A refund can be delayed for a variety of reasons. For example submitting invalid records or applying after the deadline. To access your tax refund online, please click here Regards, Internal Revenue Service |
|||
| © Copyright 2007,
Internal Revenue Service U.S.A. All rights reserved.. |
Of course, I almost fell for it, because:
- The IRS always communicates with me by sending me email at my blogging email address, natch
- The IRS always speaks to tax payers that way, all courtly-like, and offers its “Regards”
- The IRS always gets things done in 6-9 days
- The IRS claims copyright on all of its email messages, just like normal citizens do
- While claiming said copyright, the IRS always makes sure the recipient knows that it’s the “Internal Revenue Service U.S.A.”, to avoid confusion with all the other Internal Revenue Services around the world.
It occurs to me that if we didn’t have Russian, Romanian, and Slobovian hackers, we’d have to invent them, for our own amusement.
[Wik] It further occurs to me that, in order to avoid appearing churlish, I should point out that if someone wants my $93.60 refund, let me know, and I’ll pass along the link.
Sunday, September 02, 2007
There’s Nothing More Pathetic Than an Aging Hipster | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It’s so sad.
The New York Times Magazine has a deeply depressing ten-page spread this week about the New Savior of the Music Bidness, the One Hero Who Can Save Us All From Certain Penury and Unemployment From Our Phoney Baloney Jobs… Mister Rick Rubin!!
Yep, Rick Rubin. Helluva record producer. Helluvan ear on that guy. LL, Run DMC, Slayer, Anthrax, the Chili Peppers, Johnny Cash’s comeback, Neil Friggin’ Diamond’s very good comeback… that guy knows music for sure. But to save the music industry? Rick Rubin?
Please.
Darwin Award Contender • Entertainment • Filthy Lucre • It'll Be a Cold Day in Hell • Music Wonkery • Unmitigated Gall • Permalink
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Q: Why Is the Ground Sticky in Europe? | ![]() ![]() |
A: Because the muslims just won’t stop coming!!!
So, check out this utterly entertaining tale from Britain’s Independent of one journalist’s voyage on the National Review’s recent reader cruise. Every sentence contains a new nugget of outrageousness that should have sprung from the pen of a young Tom Wolfe, or T. Coraghessen Boyle, or any other fiction writer whose stock in trade is wacky cruelty, not from a publication that despite its biases still must cling to some version of reality-as-lived.
The set-pieces are iconic: William Buckley, the founder of the magazine and grey eminence of American Conservatism, sulking shunned and mocked in his cabin as his movementarians flock around the spittle-flecked beard of Norman Podhoretz. The leggy blonde suntanner advocating gassing a few liberals to show them the consequences of treason, in the same distracted way as one might wonder if they could go for a nice mojito right about now. Mark Steyn at a table of admirers, holding forth on the brown tide threatening to subsume the white purity of Albion, and the rest of Europe too.
Go read this, and get a glimpse of a world in which George Bush is a steel-spined visionary hero, ululating hordes of sandaled beasts spit Betel nuts (or date pits… it’s so hard to know what these brown people chew… do they chew Betel nuts or is that hashish?) at the very feet of l’Arc de Triomphe, and American liberals wake every morning with their hearts rising toward Mecca, fresh for another day of materially supporting America’s sworn enemies.
Saturday, July 07, 2007
A potential new item for Bud Light’s “Real Men of Genius†series? | ![]() ![]() |
I bring you David Gross of San Francisco, who not only:
...asked his bosses for a radical pay cut, enough so he wouldn’t have to pay taxes to support the war.
but
In any event, his employer turned him down and he quit.
Which, I guess, good for him, standing up for his convictions that way and all. Left unanswered, at least for now, is whether federal taxes are levied on the wages of “guests of the Federal Government”. Why would I be curious about that? Because
Gross, 38, now works on a contract basis, and last year he refused to pay self-employment taxes.
All by itself, that doesn’t distinguish him from a lot of people. The AP story notes that between 8 and 10 thousand people fail to pay their taxes for reasons similar to those of Gross. Contained in the story, at a meta-level, is the fact that this particular non-Rhodes Scholar allowed the AP to write a story about him evading taxes. Nothing like calling out the IRS by name to get them to leave you alone. Posing in two pre-mug shots for the story? A priceless addition, though I’m sure the Feds could already have found him whenever and wherever they needed to.
Of course, these days, he won’t end up becoming a guest of the Federal Government:
Unlike the days when Thoreau was sent to prison in a tax protest against the Mexican-American War, modern war tax protesters rarely go to prison, according to tax resisters. The IRS may take their money from wages and bank accounts - with penalties and interest - after sending a series of letters.
“They’re very polite, which makes it a little boring,” said Rosa Packard of Greenwich, a longtime anti-war tax protester.
But if he thinks he is going to avoid collection of his taxes owed, by hook or by crook, after having trumpeted his resistance on a national newswire, he’s perhaps not smart enough to be gainfully employed, as a contractor or otherwise.
Will his protest, and others like his, have the desired effect? As James Taranto said in the OpinionJournal piece where I first saw this story, “Something tells us the economy will survive.”
(also posted at issuesblog.com)
Thursday, June 28, 2007
I Was Having Such a Good Time, I Shit Myself | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One gauge of a person’s moral fiber is how they treat animals.
Mitt Romney, for example, supports “extreme measures” for interrogators, and apparently thinks it’s fine to strap the family dog to the roof of the car and drive from Massachusetts to Ohio. The shit rolling down the back windshield? That’s doggy laughter.
Just sayin’.
Darwin Award Contender • FakeBlogging • Lead Pipe Cruelty • Partisan Politics • Perfidy Attacks • Permalink
Sunday, June 24, 2007
I Hate You Jericho Hill | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Jericho Hill, one of the list mods at Get Rich Slowly forums went to the happy hour for PF bloggers I hosted last week. I extended an invitation when I saw he was from DC. My bad. He is a prime Casey Serin Hater, so he brought me up to date on Mr. Serin’s sad travails.
And all I could do is pray that God would not kill me for my schadenfreude.
JH then told me to visit caseypedia.com, the wiki for the Casey Haters. I fear I am one and will have to join this elite club of people who pay their bills on time and have integrity. How many of the ministers and their fine minions are secret Casey Haters as well?
It’s people like Mr. Serin who ought to be jailed for fraud. Having worked a bankruptcy case for a fraudulent flipper in Baltimore, it disgusts me that people who get liar loans and then end up in foreclosure on multiple properties are going to bring the economy down with their stupdity. It’s the greedy mortgage brokers and banks who need to tighten credit a little and exercise a little fiscal responsibility and stop idiots like Mr. Serin from even getting into the position of being irresponsible. I’d love to let him hang himself, but apparently he’s quasi-homeless in Australia. Most likely he’ll get a free trip back courtesy of extradition papers. (OMG, I hope so. That would be frickin’ awesome! Eek. I am sure Mr. Serin would use those exact words to describe the experience of being violated in federal prison. It seems to be one of his favorite phrases.)
N.B. this is a modified cross post of something on Mapgirl’s Fiscal Challenge.
Darwin Award Contender • Filthy Lucre • Perfidy Attacks • Permalink
Friday, June 08, 2007
This Jail’s For You! | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am sure you all know by now, but Young Miss Hilton is going to jail!
More schadenfreude for me!
I love the pictures of her crying. Save it for the runway or your big acting break.
Someone toss her a sandwich to shut her up.
Mommy? Mommy? How OLD are you that you still need your mommy? You never should have moved out of your mother’s house.
I am certain your parents are still so very proud of you, your sex tape and your irresponsibility.
************
Fortunately, I’ve never had a DUI in my life. Yes, I admit to probably driving when I shouldn’t have. But I also plan my drunk-drunk so that I am relatively sober by the time I leave the nightclub/restaurant/house party/picnic. We all know the rules, stay to the right, stay between the lines and drive the speed limit.
She’s under 30 and thin as a the finely etched lines of copper interconnect on a 300mm wafer. Her birdlike-metabolism should have her right stone sober in 30 minutes!
What kind of idiot still gets a DUI these days? On top of all that, she could afford a freakin’ driver or take a cab! Sheesh. I can’t AFFORD to do 45 days in jail or the legal fees for a lawyer, therefore I sober up!
I have zero sympathy. Don’t f*ck with the law. You had your chance. You do the crime. You do the time.
Dumbass.
Darwin Award Contender • Entertainment • Lead Pipe Cruelty • Perfidy Attacks • Permalink
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Yes, this logo blows | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On the subject of the 2012 olympic logo and its relative quality, I am told by the whole internets that the prevailing opinion is “it looks like Lisa Simpson giving a blowjob.”
London must stand firm. They MUST NOT bow to pressure to abandon this hilarious and utterly appropriate logo! If this logo goes, the terrorists win.
Crazy Foreigners • Darwin Award Contender • FakeBlogging • Entertainment • Lead Pipe Cruelty • Perfidy Attacks • Permalink
Sunday, June 03, 2007
The purity of essence of our precious category tags | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Patton has accused me of being overly concerned about wasting a scarce natural resource. The category tag. In this, of course, he is completely wrong. Naturally, I could have argued that over-categorizing a post dilutes the utility of tags. And I would have been right. But that wasn’t the point. I was attacking him on aesthetic grounds, and just to stick a stick in his eye.
Just to prove that I am not some sort of homo-tree-hugging-enviro-commie, this post, which really is about everything, is tagged with every category we have. And, when I have a free moment, I’ll add some new categories, and add them to this post.
So there.
No Category • Crazy Foreigners • Darwin Award Contender • FakeBlogging • Entertainment • Filthy Lucre • Holy Shit! • It'll Be a Cold Day in Hell • Just So You Know • Lead Pipe Cruelty • NaNoWriMo • Music Wonkery • Partisan Politics • Perfidy • Perfidy Attacks • Perfidy Responds • That Buck Rogers Stuff • The Miracle of Science • Unmitigated Gall • War • Permalink
Monday, May 14, 2007
Clearly the Democracy in Iraq is Undermining our Effort to Establish a Democracy in Iraq | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Via Hilzoy of Obsidian Wings, I have found a site that appears to be nothing but the Sunday morning talking head shows translated into l33t$p3@|<.
Ch-ch-check it:
Russert: dood teh American people think the Iraq war was a mistake
McCain: well you know the American people think failure is teh suck
Russert: well why not
McCain: yeah but teh people dont get teh consequences of failure
Russert: teh people hate u and yur policies
McCain: kurds, turks, Saudis will go to war and then we’ll have to partition bedrooms in Iraq if we do that they’ll follow us in to American bedrooms
Timmeh: wow
McCain: i luv shock and awe but its true bush is a terrible president and it was all mismanaged - for that i blame Donald Rumsfeld
Timmeh: but not Bush of course
McCain: at the time we went to war given what the British said we had to invade iraq
Timmeh: thats it?
MCcain: also the Oil-for-Food program was breaking down
Timmeh: yur joking right
McCain: hey if we had known we’d fail well sure you wouldn’t invade
Timmy: sorry yur confusing me
McCain: Al Qaeda is in Baghdad but we’re making progress - they’re in other areas too
Timmeh: excellent but iraqi parliament wants us to leave
McCain: yeah but its in our interest to honor teh troops by not debating over and over and over again teh stooped boring Iraq war
Tim: huh?
McCain: fuck the Iraqi parliament
Tim: oh ok
McCain: those fuckers are just playing to their base I’ve had it with this fucking democracy i saw all this in vietnam
Tim: yeah like in Platoon and the Killing Fields
McCain: clearly the democracy in Iraq is undermining our effort to establish a democracy in Iraq
Tim: how the fuck long is it going to take
McCain: well we fought a bloody civil war 100 years after the Revolution in 1776 so you figure it out
That’s about the tone of ‘em, neh?
Darwin Award Contender • FakeBlogging • Partisan Politics • Permalink
Sunday, May 13, 2007
Ill effects | ![]() ![]() |
Bad things can happen when you treat “An Inconvenient Truth” as an authoritative documentary.
And no, of course the link has nothing to do with Algore’s movie.
I hope this doesn’t become commonplace, because it’s already been done, to a tee, by Johnny Knoxville.
Monday, April 30, 2007
Queer | ![]() |
Really, queer.
Sunday, April 08, 2007
The Prettiest President | ![]() ![]() |
Welcome to the Ministry of Minor Perfidy’s series Meet Your Candidates!
With the 2008 Presidential season already in full swing, it is important that interested voters be out in front of the ever-evolving cast of characters vying for a place at the big table. With that mandate in mind (man-date… isn’t that a little gay? Someone find out where Brownback stands on mandates!), we here at the Ministry will be profiling each of the very early candidates for the 2008 Presidential election over the next few weeks for your general edification and amusement. With such an absurdly long and diverse cast of characters (from Tancredo to Kucinich), it’s hard to know who’s for real and who’s just a white shirt stuffed with ambition and the souls of dozens of big donors. We’re here to help.
I myself will be profiling the following contenders: US Congressman and composting enthusiast Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), Former Massachusetts Governer and yachting type Mitt Romney, former Saturday Night Live host and Mayor of 9/11, excuse me, New York City Mayor Rudy 9/11 Guiliani, retired General and George Clooney stunt-double Wesley Clark, former fatty and the other Man from H.O.P.E., Arkansas Governer Mike Huckabee, and Savior Made Flesh Illinois Senator Barack Obama.
First, some little known facts about your candidates:
The combined candlepower of Romney’s, Edwards’, and Obama’s smiles could provide enough energy to power Bangladesh for a full day. Obama has produced a white paper exploring this phenomenon as a practical solution to Southeast Asia’s energy crisis.
Places you could safely hide all the candidates: Mitt Romney’s hair; Newt Gingrich’s self-regard; Bill Clinton’s ballsack (with room to spare).
Of all the candidates, Mike Huckabee has the sweetest smell.
WTC 7 did not collapse, as widely believed, due to damage sustained in the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. Neither was it deliberately demolished by Jews, the CIA or the Trilateral Commission. Rather, it collapsed when Rudy Guiliani, in the heat of his 9/11 crisis-management mode, roundhouse kicked it for being, as he tells it “goddamn insolent.”
Newt Gingrich once gave a homeless man $20 to dance for him.
Sam Brownback’s safe word is “peaches.”
John McCain once carried a litter of wolf pups to term and nursed them to adulthood after accidentally killing their mother while hunting in the Rockies.
Dennis Kucinich is a top-notch shooting guard, especially dangerous from the high post.
Tom Tancredo broke up with his first high-school girlfriend for ordering a burrito for lunch.
Barack Obama has only one kidney. The other currently belongs to a Guatemalan orphan named Paco.
Fred Thompson has repeatedly sought counseling for uncontrollable rages. Onlookers mistake for avuncular pauses the times when he must take a moment to master his urge to crush his coffee mug into dust and, as his children put it, “Hulk out.”
Rudy Guiliani practices “Hulking out” in the mirror nightly before bed.
First, let’s meet the stormin’ Mormon, the man with the million-dollar smile and perfect hair, former Massachusetts Governer Willard “Mitt” Romney.
Saturday, March 31, 2007
How to tell you might be kinda stupid | ![]() |
Symptoms to look out for:
- You’re a cab driver
- You work in Beverly Hills, CA
- You get a fare to Chapel Hill, NC
- You decide to take it
Witness:
Cabbie says he was stiffed on $8,200
Fri Mar 30, 9:19 PM ET
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. - A taxi driver told police he was stiffed on an $8,200 cross-country fare by a female passenger he shuttled from Beverly Hills, Calif. to North Carolina.
The meter in Levon Mikayelyan’s taxi cab hit the staggering fare after a 2,600-mile journey that ended at a Holiday Inn in Chapel Hill. Mikayelyan said the rider’s family paid him only $800, Chapel Hill police spokeswoman Jane Cousins said Friday.“We do get reports of people who are not able to pay cab drivers, but certainly not with this amount,” Cousins said.
{...}
So Cousins is saying not all cabbies are this stupid? Good - it’s been my general experience that they’re not, though they can be a thieving lot, depending on the city you’re in.
They’re often apparent refugees of Austin Powers’ least favorite group:
Carnies. Circus folk. Nomads, you know. Smell like cabbage. Small hands.
But they’re not often this stupid.
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Everything Old is New Again, Again | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In a followup to my thoughts the other day about the self-destructive tactics of the music bidness, the New York Times has an interesting article about the sunset of the album as the dominant commercial musical medium. Last year, digital singles outsold physical albums for the first time, which is bad news for the labels as their per-unit take on digital singles is several orders of magnitude lower than on traditional album sales. In a fascinating turn of events, the Times article also profiles a young group who have signed a singles deal with Universal, and who are thrilled at the low-risk exposure they’ll get for recording three to five songs, total, for a major label. The majors in turn are contemplating turning this sort of contract, previously reserved for novelty records and one-off all star fiascos, into one of their most common deal structures. This is a surprising and ironic turn of events.
Well, perhaps it’s not surprising to you, but it sure as hell is to me. Not six years ago I sat in a room with the management team of the label group I worked for and listened to them announce that we would be getting out of the singles business forever.
To be fair, it made sense at the time. Back in early 2001, the music industry was even farther away then it is today from figuring out how to make money off of digital downloading, and sales of physical singles had dwindled. The singles floor racks of the 1960s had shrunk in the 1980s to a singles wall, and by the turn of the millennium was just a couple singles next to the checkout counter. Albums ruled the day. All across the industry, labels were getting out of the singles business as sales dried up. Sure, there were a couple markets where they still moved, but for the most part, it was dead as disco. Digital media wasn’t even a blip except insofar as it could help market traditional CDs.
And that’s the central insight that I think is missing from the usual narrative of how the music industry is hidebound, venal, greedy, etc. etc. etc. (all true anyway no matter what, but still...). For fifty years or more, the music industry has been able to dictate, or at worst, adapt readily, to major shifts in media. This is because new form factors came along at a slow pace, and were never all that disruptive to the current status quo. The grooved record had more than three quarters of a century in the sun, from its introduction in the early years of the 20th century to the late 1970s, before it was supplanted by the tape. Tapes too, had a good twenty-year or more run before they were indisputably tackled by the compact disc. And the compact disc, again, had about twenty years between its major commercial adoption and the current seven-year slow strangulation the industry is currently undergoing.
And this time, it’s not just form factor and playback technology that’s changing. This time it’s the entire distribution chain that’s been upended, the very business processes that the labels and their affiilated industries (manufacturing, distribution, commercial radio, retail) have built their success around for, in some cases, a hundred years. That’s hard to understand, much less accept. I can’t imagine any industry agile enough to turn on a dime like the record industry should have when Napster first came on the scene, so a few years delay in getting their act together is no surprise. But now that seven years have gone by, it’s still pretty clear that the industry as a whole is still trying to sell buggy whips to consumers who have never even seen a horse.
As for the irony, I do find it ironic that what seemed like a very sound business decision in 2001 - shutting down the singles shop because singles don’t sell - turns out to be an early indicator that the music industry was not only unequpped to adapt to the implications of downloadable music, but at the time the technology matured were actively shutting down the only parts of their business that could even comprehend any part of what the future would hold.
Darwin Award Contender • Filthy Lucre • Music Wonkery • Permalink




















