Tuesday, August 05, 2003
Rest of June Archives up | ![]() |
Seeing as how gnomes proved to be completely unmotivated workers, the Ministry was forced to rely on pixies. While pixies do indeed work harder than the gnomes, they are less reliable. Some of the posts may be out of order. Rest assured that while we will make no effort to go back and correct the mistakes, the pixies were dealt with most severely.
You will notice that there are even some comments transferred over. Given the number of pixies that were sacrificed to transfer even one week of comments, even the Ministry blanches at doing it again.
Mitigation is the problem | ![]() |
Well, that is the problem, isn’t it? The new prescription benefit program will actually help some people, but at the cost of doing enormous damage elsewhere. Including these nuggets of goodness is what allows these abominations to become law. Because some disingenuous senator can point to the one nice bit and say, “but look, we’re helping old people get the meds they need and not have to eat cat food! You don’t want old people to eat cat food, do you?”
I don’t oppose helping people. I do oppose helping people who don’t need to be helped. But the AARP and others oppose means testing tooth and nail. And the sad fact is that if a benefit becomes available, people will use it regardless of whether or not they “need” it. Soon after, they will feel entitled to that benefit, and will scream bloody murder if some cold hearted conservative tries to take it away. Every beneficiary of one of these vast entitlement programs becomes an instant, permanent constituent for whoever says they’ll continue or expand these programs.
When we create these programs we have to limit the eligibility, and everywhere possible build in mechanisms that encourage people to leave the program. It should never be just a handout. It should never provide everything, otherwise there is never any incentive to provide for yourself. A safety net is just that - something to catch you if you fall. It shouldn’t be a place to live permanently. Benefit programs have to be set up with an eye toward personal responsibility. The responsibility to work, to provide for your own retirement, etc. Privatizing Social Security would go a long way towards allowing people to actually provide for their own futures.
Instead of blindly paying a huge chunk of your earnings (matched by your employer, remember) to the government, imagine that that money went into your own account. Every quarter you’d get a statement showing how much money you had. If you die, your family would inherit the cash - unlike the current system where the money largely just disappears into the government black hole. In this scenario, everyone would actually be providing for their own futures, and we wouldn’t have to worry about SS going bust, and we’d worry far less about providing for the needs of seniors.
On Mitigation | ![]() |
It occurs to me that the question of medical benefits for older people is thornier than I thought. I stand by my comments of yesterday, but a conversation with my sage and oracular wife has reminded me that the Medicare bill will do some concrete good. Namely, it will allow poorer senior citizens without many assets or good insurance to afford and gain access to the drugs that keep them alive. If they’re taking say 6 pills a day, and don’t have decent coverage, the expense can be crippling. Importation from Canada can help that group of seniors afford BOTH food AND medicine. Unless you are a true Social Darwinian, you cannot fail to see that this is good for them.
Of course, most Boomers and Greatest Generationers are already set up with good insurance and perscription coverage, and probably won’t bother with the extra bother of mail-ordering drugs from Canada. A good insurance plan gives you $5/$10/$15 coverage on perscriptions, and there is no conceivable benefit to going to Canada instead of Rite Aid. So, it’s possible that the effect of drug importation will be less than I thought, but it remains to be seen how many people take advantage of it.
The damnedest thing about healthcare legislation is that even the most venal and grasping bill contains a nugget of good intentions that will concretely help people that need it badly. Makes it kind of hard to work up a white-hot denunciatory rage, I tell you what. Why can’t people just be evil and motives clear? Dang!
Monday, August 04, 2003
Some June Archives are up | ![]() |
The benighted gnomes in the archive department have died of exhaustion after only finishing the transfer of archives for the second half of June. Needless to say the Ministry is displeased with their total lack of dedication.
When we find more lackies, more archives will be posted.
The Health Care Thingy | ![]() |
While I’m on a roll, commenting on everything Pythagosaurus posts (I’ll get my own brain soon, I promise) I thought I’d throw in my thoughts on the whole health care thingy:
The interesting thing about the prescription drug benefit is that it was intended as leverage to get certain elements of Congress to agree to reform Medicare. There is a certain crunchy political compromise sort of goodness to that – in exchange for enacting a hideously expensive piece of crap legislation, we will excise the worst parts of a grotesquely expensive, double-plus crappy abomination of a legislation. Instead, we now have both, which is more stupendously expensive crappiness than you can shake a stick at, plus the stick.
The prescription drug benefit program’s only saving grace is that it might not kill the goose that lays the wonderful, groovy new drugs. In every other way, it is an immoral, bald faced, long term mandate for thievery from the younger generations. But the drug benefits are really a side show in the larger catastrophe.
There are three elements that form the center of my perception of the problem:
- The health “industry” constitutes as much as a seventh of the total US economy.
- Old people represent a growing percentage of the whole population. Not as bad as Europe or Japan, but still…
- The Byzantine and corrupt nature of the industry as a whole compromises the effectiveness of the system.
On Business And Labor | ![]() |
Buckethead: two points I query:
1) You seem to suggest that the current administration is not especially pro-business. Am I reading too much into your comments, or are you on crack?
2) I am well aware that you are by and large a reasonable person, your views on the perfidousness of certain labor laws being a shining example. But if that is the case sir, how do you justify your enthusiasm for the film “Van Wilder”? I mean, it’s pretty good, but a shrine to Ryan Reynolds? Come now…
Labor Bad! Business Good! | ![]() |
In reference to Pythagosaurus’ recent post, I have this to say:
There is a list of many things that this administration (or any, for that matter) could do that would be good for business. This item strikes me as being very, very low on that list, if it’s on it at all.
I work in the tech industry; and I and many people I know have been screwed by the comp time thingy. Since many techies are salaried, they are already exempt from most of the regulations regarding overtime. If you are an hourly worker, then by all means you should get overtime.
The only way that this suggestion would make sense is if the worker in question could opt between the two, and if he took the comp time, could take the time on his rather than his employer’s discretion.
Contrary to received opinion, I am not some sort of conservative robot who automatically says “Labor bad! Business good!” Worker rights are important to me, if only because I’m a worker myself. While I have often complained about unions, especially the teacher’s unions (sorry, Mike) it’s mostly because they have made nuisances of themselves in recent times. I would certainly not begrudge the labor movement its utility and victories back more than a half century ago, but nowadays they seem to act more as purely special interest groups, lobbying for gains at the expense of the rest of society. Like the AARP.
So, I agree - this proposal is a pile of horseshit.
Looting the Drugstore | ![]() |
I love it when Ross gets on a tear .
I went on a little screed a few weeks ago about this very issue of senior citizens voting themselves any benefit they wish, looting the store at the expense of future generations (e.g. yours truly). It’s shameful and foolish. But there’s another victim which we have not yet explored: the drug companies themselves.
I have long harbored the suspicion that health insurance is mostly a huge vicious scam, feeding alternately on doctors, patients, and medical care facilities and manufacturers. Even factoring in the hideous r&d costs that are required to come up with a new heart pump, the fact that an uninsured person can go into the hospital with a broken bone and come out with a $12,000 bill is unbelievable. The web of mutual back-scratching, rebilling, and cooperative deals is the best built house of cards ever.
But there’s a weak side. The Medicare reform proposal before Congress now would allow older Americans to get their drugs from Canada, where prices are cheaper. Well, great, except that Canadian drugs are so cheap because American patients and insurance companies are footing the drug R&D bill for the entire world!
Other nations, including the EU and Canada, have enacted price controls to keep the cost of drugs lower than the cost of production. Despite this wish-based economic policy, there is no way around the high cost of creating, testing, and approving a new medication. If innovation is to continue, that money has to come from somewhere, and currently it is coming from American insurance premium payers, period. The Medicaid reform package would in effect take senior citizens out of the game, further shrinking the R&D money pool and leading to higher drug prices for the rest of us. This is especially galling because seniors typically need far more regular medical care than your average 29-year old nonsmoking yoga enthusiast.
I don’t claim to cry for Pfizer and Merck. They can take care of their damn selves. But their expensive American drugs are part of the Great Wheel of Graft that keeps the American medical establishment functioning. By legislating themselves a way out of the great Ponzi scheme of drug research and insurance, senior citizens and their allies in Congress are about to kill the goose that lays the little golden pills. As with Social Security, they will be taking out of the system far, far more than they ever put in, leaving us high and dry. Wonder what will happen then?
Thanks guys. Greatest generation my shiny metal ass.
Perfidy and 40 hour work weeks | ![]() |
Diamond John Kerry has begun stumping for an issue with actual, real value! The Boston Globe/AP is reporting that Kerry is attempting to launch a petition against the Bush Administration’s changes to overtime regulations.
Whoopee. A damn petition. But it’s a good cause, and one that the Democrats have utterly failed to capitalize on in their bumbling assault on Castle Dubya.
In short, the changes to overtime policy allow businesses to reclassify a large chunk of workers (how large? wisdom varies--some say a little over half a million, big labor says 8 million) as exempt from overtime pay. Basically, the new rules would give employers greater latitude in determining whether workers making between $22.1K and $65K per year are vital enough to the function of a business to be exempt from overtime pay.
Instead, employers could choose to issue comp time to workers who work over 40 hours per week.
Though the Department of Labor insists it is not fundamentally changing anything, in separate discussions spokespeople have admitted that it would make it easier for employers to deny lower-paid rank and file workers overtime.
Not such a big deal, right? Weeeeel, I dunno. The 40-hour week plus overtime was one of the great victories of the labor movement in the United States, and any attempt at revising that standard will be naturally met with skepticism. Furthermore, having worked for my share of grasping, greedy, and utterly perfidous employers, I am well aware of the many ways in which business may legally deprive you of your own time. The new rules just make it easier to do so.
The Wit and Wisdom of Jim Traficant | ![]() |
From the “Free Traficant” site linked below, some pearls of wisdom from the mouth of The Don Of Youngstown, cast before ye swine:
“When I get out I will grab a sword like Maximus Meridius Demidius and as a Gladiator I will stab people in the crotch.”
“Think about it. While 60 percent of taxpayer calls to the IRS go unanswered, the IRS agents were watching Marilyn Chambers do the Rotary International. Beam me up here. It is time to pass a flat 15 percent sales tax and abolish this gambling, porno-watching IRS completely. I yield back the internal rectal service of the United States of America. “
“The Pentagon just did not waive the Buy American Act, the Pentagon waved Old Glory the wrong way. Mr. Speaker, I suggest that these Chinese berets be made into suppositories and be used on Pentagon brass. Madam Speaker, I yield back the need for Congress to hire a proctologist to train Pentagon procurement officials on the buy American laws.”
“They are officially called unisex restrooms. Unbelievable. What is next? Unisex locker rooms with thong/jock support dispensers? How about Maxipad vending machines in locker rooms? Beam me up. I yield back this higher education business as yet simply getting high. “
“If you don’t get those cameras out of my face, I’m gonna go 8.6 on the Richter scale with gastric emissions that’ll clear this room!”
“I want you to disregard all the opposing counsel has said. I think they’re delusionary. I think they’ve had something funny for lunch in their meal, I think they should be handcuffed, chained to a fence and flogged, and all of their hearsay evidence should be thrown the hell out. And if they lie again, I’m going to go over there and kick them in the crotch. Thank you very much.”
Diamond Jim Traficant for President! | ![]() |
YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! [pumps arm exultantly like Kirk Gibson]
“WASHINGTON (AP)—James A. Traficant, a former Ohio congressman in prison for bribery and racketeering charges, has given his approval to supporters to form a presidential exploratory committee.”
“The battle to free James Traficant and to evict the Socialists and ‘free traders’ from the Democratic Party is now under way,” campaign spokesman Marcus Belk said. “Someone buy the Washington establishment a bottle of Maalox.”
Belk said the group, which announced Friday that it had gotten Traficant’s approval by letter, has raised $10,224 in cash pledges made on Traficant’s campaign Web site. The average contribution was $71, he said.“Traficant, a Democrat who represented northeast Ohio in the House for nine terms, was expelled from Congress in July 2002 after being convicted in a federal court of racketeering, bribery and tax evasion. He is now serving an eight-year prison sentence at the minimum-security Allenwood federal prison in White Deer, Pennsylvania. ”
Never mind that in an election between a trained goat and Jim Traficant, I’d go with the goat every time, this is wonderful! Just what this country needs: a corrupt, venal slippery populist demagogue with a talent for making the insane sound reasonable as long as he keeps talking. And an Ohioan to boot!
Let’s review: the current headline-making political figures in Ohio right now are Dennis “Burning River” Kucinich, Sideshow Jerry Springer, and James “Beam Me Up!” Traficant. Makes me proud. Those fat cats in Washington better circle the wagons… 2004 is the Year Of The Buckeye!
Right here and now, I am announcing my support for former Representative James A. Traficant for President of the United States in 2004. But first things first… Free Mumia!Traficant
Sunday, August 03, 2003
Praise Jebus! | ![]() |
The Ministry of Minor Perfidy is moving to a better place. (And no, we’re not dead.) Our crack team of commando net researchers determined that the perfidy.org domain had left the bizarre purgatory of the .org registrar’s “pending delete hold” status and become available; and our lawyer minions were dispatched forthwith to secure the rights to the Ministry’s proper home on the interweb.
That they were succesful certainly increased their life expectancy, but also freed the Ministry from durance vile in the decidedly low rent .biz realm. Over the next several days we will make the switch, generously providing a redirect from perfidy.org to the new digs so as to avoid confusion among the unwary. But note! You must learn to stand on your own two feet, because the redirect will not be there forever.
Saturday, August 02, 2003
Stalin was Evil | ![]() |
Not only was Stalin the head of the second most murderous regime in world history, responsible for reppression, famine and countless other crimes - that son of bitch Uncle Joe tried to kill the Duke.
CBS news reported this morning on the tube that in the late forties and early fifties, Stalin ordered multiple hit attempts on John Wayne, the outspoken anti-Communist actor.
If anyone had any doubt that Communism is evil, evil, evil, right to the bone, well there’s your proof. You don’t try and kill the Duke.
Friday, August 01, 2003
Apologia | ![]() |
Buckethead has been dominating this forum of late, and with good cause. “Real life” has intruded on my behalf, and posting will be light.
Company. . . Right Face! March!







